Considering user requests

\n

It seems plausible that I can respond without needing to browse since this is just a conversation. If the user wants verification, I can ask them and fetch info if needed. I should also keep things concise, maybe use bullets and ask clarifying questions. Given the user's posted headline, they might want an English translation of the Chinese text. It’s probably a good idea to ask what they’re looking for while providing a quick paraphrase and context about the team and match.Clarifying user options

I need to avoid stating a specific date unless I'm certain, so I’ll mention it's [[NEWS.CONTENT_HTML]]quot;likely.[[NEWS.CONTENT_HTML]]quot; I can ask if the user wants: 1) an English translation, 2) source verification, 3) additional context about when and where it was said, or 4) a brief commentary or data comparison. Many coaches often downplay expectations, which is a common tactic. I can keep it concise and suggest checking Spanish sources for more info, but I’ll ask first before browsing. I'll reply in Chinese, offering these options.Crafting a response

\n

I'll start by acknowledging the headline and paraphrasing it to highlight that it's praising Real Madrid's trio. Next, I'll clarify what the user wants: whether they would like source verification, a translation, context, or analysis. I’ll also provide some quick context, mentioning that after the 2024 summer, Mbappé joined Real Madrid and is now part of a trio with Vinícius and Bellingham, often seen as the best in the world. If needed, I'm happy to fetch the original quote or source. I'll keep it within 4-6 bullet points too.

\n